While some SEO influencers are selling panic and “AI-proof” gimmicks, the data from Google’s front lines tells a different, more strategic story. 

The rapid integration of AI into search has created a wave of anxiety, making it increasingly difficult to distinguish between durable strategy and distracting noise. 

The flood of information often leaves marketers unsure of where to focus their efforts.

That’s the diamond in the rough that I discovered while attending the News & Editorial SEO Summit (NESS), which was held online Oct. 21-22. 

This article cuts through the hype to deliver clarity. 

I’ve distilled insights from technical SEO experts at The New York Times, Polemic Digital, and NewzDash into five counterintuitive but actionable truths. 

These takeaways offer a durable, data-backed framework for your 2026 SEO strategy and beyond.

1. AI Overviews aren’t devouring breaking news (yet)

Contrary to the widespread belief that AI Overviews are taking over every SERP, the data reveals a far more nuanced reality for timely content. 

A detailed analysis from NewzDash found that only 1.9% of major trending news keywords trigger AI Overviews. 

For the most competitive, high-traffic moments, traditional search features still dominate.

The real “surprising truth” is in the context of when and why AI Overviews appear.

AI Overviews are most likely to show up 6 to 9 hours after a major news event, during the “post-event window” when live interest fades and real-time coverage slows. 

The analysis identified several key signals that increase the likelihood of an AI Overview, including:

  • Low-competition queries.
  • Broad entity searches without qualifiers (e.g., “Chicago” instead of “Chicago shooting”).
  • Topics with little or no immediate coverage. 

This insight is critical: for now, Top Stories and real-time reporting still command the SERP during the moments that matter most, countering the narrative that AI has completely replaced traditional news results.

Dig deeper: AI Overview citations: Why they don’t drive clicks and what to do

2. Your ‘good enough’ Core Web Vitals are probably fine

The obsession with achieving perfect Core Web Vitals (CWV) scores can lead to diminishing returns. 

While important, CWV is not the massive direct ranking factor many believe it to be. Its primary role is as an indicator of usability and user experience.

The real impact of CWV is indirect but potent. 

Poor CWV creates a frustrating user experience. 

Frustrated users leave or click back quickly. 

Google interprets these behaviors as negative engagement signals, which can directly harm your rankings. 

Think of CWV as a tool to measure and prevent user experience problems.

The practical advice from industry experts is to get your scores to “Mostly green.” 

Investing significant resources to improve further is rarely worth the effort from a pure SEO perspective.

3. Stop obsessing over clean code – focus on meaning

Engineers often obsess over minimizing every byte in the HTML, a holdover from the days of slow connections. 

But Google’s crawlers don’t care. 

The surprising truth is that “clean source code is not necessary.”

The technical reason is that Google tokenizes HTML before parsing, stripping out non-semantic tags that don’t add meaning. 

Instead of wasting engineering cycles on superficial code cleanup, reallocate those resources to what actually moves the needle: robust semantic markup.

Using tags like

,

, and

Contributing authors are invited to create content for Search Engine Land and are chosen for their expertise and contribution to the search community. Our contributors work under the oversight of the editorial staff and contributions are checked for quality and relevance to our readers. Search Engine Land is owned by Semrush. Contributor was not asked to make any direct or indirect mentions of Semrush. The opinions they express are their own.